Showing posts with label Recommendations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Recommendations. Show all posts

Saturday, April 24, 2010

Get Up from Your Rocker--Saturday Swigs #1

Unlike my previous few columns, this one will be quite brief. As I mentioned, I'll be starting a whiskey blog soon for the express purpose of having a little fun with whiskey reviews. I have a strong (one might even say cask strength) preference for scotch and bourbon, but I'm sure I'll select some Irish, Canadian, and a smattering of other stuff along the way.

I'll go into greater detail later about my reviewing methodology (yes, I have one). If the subject interests you at all, let me give you a little taste of what to expect with these reviews.


Swig of the Day: Old Grand-Dad 114 Barrel Proof Bourbon
Bottling Info: Distilled and bottled by the Old Grand-Dad Distillery Company, Frankfort, KY (OGD owned by Jim Beam); bottle is marked Lot #1

Glass: Glencairn
Served: Neat. Always.
Pour: 1 oz.

Nose: Straightaway, the nose on this is gonna rouse your tired bones from the rocker. OGD comes on with a strong--but harmonious--mixture of vanilla, caramel, and citrus, as well as pronounced hints of tobacco.

Taste: It breaks out of the gate with a citrusy sweetness carried over from the nose, and then it bolts sharply around a peppery oak bend.

Finish: I hope you're settled in your saddle, because you're in for a lingering, leathery finish of tornadic proportions.

Overall: Put it this way: you'll eye your empty glass with yearning, the glass raised in front of you as though in tacit toast to the next dram. (Or, if you're looking for something more objective, 5 out of 5.)


So, concrete flavor descriptors deployed amongst mixed metaphors, witticisms abound. That's my style. After all, for a pursuit so pleasurably subjective, it's the only way for me to do this.

If you enjoyed this, check back soon (hopefully) for my new blog: "From the Sweet to the Peat."


Read: Jim Murray's Whisky Bible 2010, the single greatest book on whisky ever written, by the single greatest reviewer of whisky there ever was.
Watch: Big Bad Love (dir. Arliss Howard, 2001)
Listen to: Django, by Luis Bacalov (particularly the theme song, which is simply unforgettable)

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Change of Plans--Wednesday Comics #1

I had every intention of posting my analysis of a Queen & Country page today, but it occurred to me that the longer I go without reporting on the C2E2 con, the less relevant what I have to say becomes. With that in mind, a brief report.

Overall, my experience was positive, but the con's main negative is the reason for my post, and it has to do with two of DC Comics' panels on Saturday.

The Brightest Day panel--the first DC panel of the day--was good fun. Even though there wasn't much in the way of news, the members of the panel did their jobs, in as much as they got us excited about what we are reading now and what we will be reading in the weeks and months ahead. The participants were lively and engaged, and I confess to being a fan of the comedy stylings of Ian Sattler.

But the second panel...that's where it went wrong. This was the DC Universe Editorial presentation, which was to be hosted by newly crowned Co-Publishers Dan Didio & Jim Lee and the new Chief Creative Officer, Geoff Jones.

And none of them showed up. There was neither acknowledgment of nor explanation for their absence. What's even stranger is that there was no mention of their absence in the press on the event.

Now, the guys I was with and I might have missed an announcement about this. Maybe there was a posting at the DC booth. If so, then you can all ignore this rant. If not, then can SOMEONE please explain to me why the new "Big Three" were no-shows? This is a brand new show in Chicago, and it behooves the publisher to have its heavy hitters running what should be the company's biggest panel on what is supposed to be the busiest day of the convention. Sattler and company did well enough (kudos to James Robinson and his surliness), but with the panel already being disappointing on the level of expectation, the seeming lack of concrete news combined with the fans' questions made for a less-than-enjoyable experience.

By the time my friends and I showed up for DC's third panel of the day, there were less people in the audience, and rightfully so, since there was a grand total of 3 people who showed up to present at the panel. (Note: Gail Simone did walk in after the panel started, and while she's one of those people who makes EVERYTHING better, we only had two hours left in the day. We wanted to get more out of our con than the same old fan questions.)

I was really pissed about the absence of the new heads of DC, and it's all but passed. I just want to know why it happened. If you've run across this entry and can put me in the wrong for being pissed, please do.

The rest of the con met or surpassed my expectations, and by all reports a successful launch for Chicago's newest show. There were plenty of guests, and, almost as important, there was plenty of room for everyone to move around. I got to meet Jonathan Hickman (who promises indie work in the not-too-distant that will surpass The Nightly News in design, which excites me no end), Mike Mignola (who seemed fine that no one was in line for him), and Ben Templesmith (who I've been waiting to meet for some time, and was impressed with how I held myself together). I also got the chance to see Carla "Speed" McNeil (who generously sketched Tara Chace for me) and Steve Bryant again, Steve in particular always being a great guy to chat with. Check out the "Support Athena Voltaire" and "Atomic Tiki Studio" links to the left to see some of his art and support his Kickstarter campaign.

More importantly, I did the two things I wanted to do that day. First, I kept my spending well in check. Second, Brian Hurtt did a fantastic sketch of Queen & Country's Paul Crocker (the young version) to add to my collection. Check it out here.

Most importantly, I went with my good friends Brad and Mark. And ultimately, they're the guys that made this whole thing fun.

Until next time, everybody. Next week: the analysis of the Q&C page, as advertised.


Read: The Engineer: Konstrukt, by Brian Churilla & Jeremy Shepherd
Watch: Going in Style (dir. Martin Brest, 1979)
Listen to: Big Fun, by Miles Davis
Eat at: Beefaroo

Monday, April 19, 2010

Refilling the Empty Hand

Right. It occurs to me that I have neglected my meager chronicle for much too long, and I return to it now for two reasons.

1) A friend of mine gave me 4 instructions yesterday, and writing each and every day this week was on the list (others include taking a look at the Shoedini, watching as much of The Mighty Boosh as I can, and having a John Parr dance party).

2) My Jim Thompson quote rant has been my last post for long enough. Those of you who read me but don't know me have likely thought that I went bug-fuck mad. Those of you who do know me...well, keep schtum, would you?

Now, apropos of daily scrawls, I know that the friend in question meant that I should be working on my variety of undeveloped and long percolating ideas for comics, prose, musical theatre, etc. And I will indeed start working on those again. But I need something both regimented and something that the rest of you can read.

Thus, I'm kinda rebooting the ol' blog. Hollywood studios are rebooting all the time now; why can't I?. From now on, each day's post will have a theme. Below are the themes and what I have on tap for this week:

MONDAY MOVIES, which I'll begin in earnest next week, due to my very procedural intro tonight.

Tomorrow will bring you TUESDAY TOMES, in which I'll look at the last Queen & Country novel, Private Wars, by Greg Rucka.

And because I just can't get enough Queen & Country, I'll use my WEDNESDAY COMICS installment to look at a single page from Rucka's first arc. I'll then argue why I think that page is one of the best examples of comic storytelling I've seen in the past several years.

THURSDAY TELEVISION will be a 2-for-1 deal, in that I'll throw in some Monday Movies action along with the TV, by talking about a strange confluence of events that led my friends and me to watch a charmingly inept and bizarre disco movie and follow that up with what turned out to be an amazing (and even more bizarre) episode of Night Court. Those of you who lived it are, of course, excused from reading this post.

FRIDAY NIGHT HEISTS will explore some of the movies that I watched in my 101-day heist marathon, along with some other flicks that I've found post-'thon. I'll start off with the 1968 Gordon Flemyng rarity, The Split.

SATURDAY SWIGS is born of a suggestion my fellow whiskey club co-founder made to me. I'm going to start reviewing whiskeys. However, while I'll post here this week, I'll very shortly pop the cork on a blog specifically for whiskey reviews. Get ready to move "From the Sweet to the Peat" in the not-too-distant, in which I shall style myself the poor man's Jim Murray.

And that brings us to OLD MAN SUNDAYS, in which I'll talk about whatever the hell I want to, goddammit.

As always, I hope to have enough smart, entertaining type that I can hand you.

Oh, and um, Maureen? You didn't mention the Gilbert Gottfried voiceover for Shoedini, which puts it over the top. I have to admit, though, I'm wondering if a Bootdini is in the works, if for no other reason than that I can hopefully do the voiceover. And, while I'm at it, thanks for the list.


Read: The Nightly News, by Jonathan Hickman
Watch: The Small Back Room (dir. Michael Powell & Emeric Pressburger, 1949)
Listen to: I Liked It Better When You Had No Heart, by Butch Walker and the Black Widows

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

A Not So Brief Intermission

This is a very personal, scattershot entry. If you're not prepared for this sort of thing from me, then leave. I will not be offended in the slightest (it's not like I'll know).

We all have those places where we find relaxation, solace and strength. They may be ours alone, although more often than not, we share them with others. Here's mine:


I know. Doesn't look like much, does it?

Nevertheless, I used to get so much rest, so much peace on this nondescript bench, which you'll still find on the 2nd floor of the Blocker Building at Texas A&M University. What peace I found owed partially to it usually being a stop on my way to one of this gentleman's classes.



This is Dr. Douglas Brooks. He was my mentor. He died last January. Somehow, I only found out 2 weeks ago.

I do not wish to pour my memories out for you all to read here; indeed, my stories of him are better heard than read. But I can't let his death go without some acknowledgment.

In the classroom, I loved the fact that he was always intellectually rebellious without being egotistical, a singularly uncommon trait in a professor. He gave me radical, yet intuitive ways to think not only about Shakespeare but indeed all of literature. For me to express those ideas here would be a disservice to the energetic elegance with which he imprinted them not only on me, but onto all of his students. He also angered more than a few people with his ideas, which drew--from me at least--nothing but admiration.

Out of the classroom, he completely changed my taste in a lot of areas, particularly film and music. We'd talk a lot about film, and as many ideas as he sparked in me, he presented so much more encouragement. Once upon a time, I gave some lectures to intro film classes at A&M, and he was always in the back row of the lecture hall. He didn't have to sit in; he just came to watch me, like a parent supporting his kid in the big game.

High expectations, bankrupt of pressure. I don't know if I've known that feeling from anyone since.

He also gave me Stanley Kubrick, David Cronenberg, and Hal Hartley. He gave me a copy of Trust many years ago, a gift which had many repercussions quite impossible for me to articulate here. That movie was one of many films, books, and albums he just gave me out of nowhere, merely because he thought I'd like them. I'm proud he bestowed that sense of random generosity upon me.

Douglas also entrusted me with his own work. While I was in College Station and even after I left, he allowed me to help him with his research and planning his courses. I loved every minute of it. He managed to make everything seem simultaneously important but lighthearted. Emphasizing the lighthearted was his specialty, and truth be told, I wouldn't be half the man I am today without him. Even with everything else he did for me, the most important thing was teaching me not to take myself so damned seriously.

I loved Douglas dearly. I'll miss him forever. I'll never forget him.

And as the man says, I'm tired of the people we need leaving us before their time.

We now resume regular programming. Thanks for listening, and good night.


Read: The Winter's Tale, by William Shakespeare
Watch: Trust (dir. Hal Hartley, 1991)
Listen to: Exposed, by Mike Oldfield

...and anything by The Residents.

P.S. If you are one of Douglas's former students and have somehow come across this blog, please feel free to add whatever comments about him you like.

Monday, May 11, 2009

A Card I Can Get Behind

Being the holder of Plot 383840 has its little advantages...


As I'm wont to say, it's the little things, kids. You too can have your own little piece of Islay.

Hmmm, now let's see how a little scotch and a little Dr Pepper taste when mixed together.

Probably like a turpentine fire.

(Takes a sip)

Oh my.


Read: Starman, by James Robinson, Tony Harris, et al
Watch: Le doulos (dir. Jean-Pierre Melville, 1962)
Listen to: On the Ropes, by Mint Royale

Monday, January 12, 2009

'Smatter?

The matter? Nothing really, save that I'm currently sporting a headache roughly the size of Montana. I'm afraid this is not the time for focused thought.

Yet, I'm here. Thus, a smattering.

First off, here's something I require from you all, you steadfast readers of my meager, meandering chronicle. I have recently discovered the glory of swearing by saying, "Trousers!" Do this. Do it with a British accent. Be fruitful with this expression and let it spread throughout the land. Do me proud.

You know what, kids? Dr. Pepper made with pure cane sugar is better than almost any scotch. (Note, I said almost. I've still got my eye on that Bunnahabhain 25-year.)

I lament what a bad moviegoer I've become. Used to be, back in my non-comic reading, non-suit wearing, non-scotch drinking days, I'd see damn near anything that came to my local multiplex. And I live across the street from one now, but I'm lucky if I see one movie at the screen every couple of weeks. It's not so much that I am diverting my so-called disposable income to other pursuits, so much as it is the fact that I just flat out don't care about seeing everything anymore. I remember believing that any film was worth watching (even
Salo). I suppose I still do believe that, but I expend no effort in putting that principle into practice. My real hope is that my sense of curiosity isn't in a state of atrophy.

Along those lines, I'm pretty well burned out on superhero comics. At least current superhero comics. And while I love books like
Queen & Country & Fell, they don't come out with any regularity (or, you know, at all for quite some time). However, here are the 7 books that you should be reading. This is not some edgy underground list or a small catalog proving how much more sophisticated my taste is for reading only books published by Drawn & Quarterly. They're just good books. Go read them. Drop whatever comic you're buying out of habit (Trinity) and pick up one of these:

Criminal
Zorro
The Lone Ranger
Incognito
FreakAngels (Start at the bottom of the page. It's free. You are, officially, without excuse.)
Madame Xanadu
Rasl

Some webular curiosities:

Curiosity #1, in which the author indicts Fox Studios for its dicketry with his own brand of dickery.
http://www.cracked.com/blog/fox-can-eat-several-dicks/

I suppose I could judge this guy, but if this kind of crap had happened to Bond, we all know I'd react with similar charm and grace.

Curiosity #2, in which we find the author expounding on the virtues of the Cinema of Jason Statham:
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=67077201&blogID=461660900

There are certainly exceptions to Mr. Oswalt's argument, but how do you not love something that includes the phrase "fuck an explosion?"

Curiosity #3, in which we find the author, with the utmost clever-clever tone, defending Frank Miller's celluloid psychological upheaval.
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=82986370&blogID=461565928

While I still haven't seen the film, I can't imagine liking it. However, there's some truth to be found in Mr. Baker's review. I also particularly respect the fact that he's defending a friend (see some of the usual boards for more info, if you can stand the boards that long).

Curiosity #4, in which I find, thanks to spotting it on the Occasional Superheroine blog, an unhealthy fascination.
http://video.yahoo.com/watch/4242098/11392286

In other news, I live in a place where--on the morrow--the high will be lower than the low. Why do I that again? Trousers!

Seriously, do any of you have ANY deliriously happy music you can recommend? Not heroic. Not inspiring. Happy. I need the musical equivalent of Eric Joyner's
Robots & Donuts. See example below, in which robots are fending off a donut invasion. (By the way, go buy this book. Now.)



A conversation I overheard the other day, the topic being Tim Sale's artistic rendering of Batman. (Groan.) Here we go:

Fanboy 1: "So do you prefer Batman with the long ears or the short ears?"
Fanboy 2: "Short ears."
Fanboy 1: "And do you prefer them in the middle or in the back?"
Fanboy 2: "I don't understand the question."

At this point, I had to walk away. I'm not sure whether it was because I was going to start laughing or join in. Six of one...

You know that feeling that wells in the pit of your stomach when your friendly neighborhood video store doesn't have the Blu-Ray version of the movie/show you're searching for? That's called Blu-Rage, kids. Gotta learn to control that. Copyright pending.

Speaking of movies, it's 2009. This means that the following films will be 10 years old this year: Magnolia, Eyes Wide Shut, The Limey, Fight Club, The Matrix, The Mission (To), The Insider, Three Kings, All About My Mother, The Thomas Crown Affair, and Episode I. Does this fact just seem OUTRIGHT WRONG to anyone else? I may not feel aged, but I do feel old.

Wow. Headache's all but gone. How 'bout that?

Hey, Sleep? I'm on my way.

I'll end tonight by saying thanks to all of you who follow this blog. That you care at all about what I have to say is heartening, to say the least. And I look forward to my eventual trip to Norway, where I can apparently anticipate a reception resembling unconditional worship.


Read:
The Road by Cormac McCarthy
Watch:
Sparrow (dir. Johnnie To, 2008) [Two words: pickpocket showdown.]
Listen to:
Born to Hustle: A Collection of Rhythm and Blues by Various Artists

Sunday, November 9, 2008

"It's not your word...it's who ya give it to!"

Those words were yelled with customary righteous indignation by Ernest Borgnine in one of my favorite movies of all time, The Wild Bunch. I think of those words, however, in relation to one of my favorite films of this year--Appaloosa--which I just watched again this evening.

There's a lot that I love about Ed Harris's western. The friendship between Virgil Cole (Harris) and Everett Hitch (Viggo Mortensen), yet another example of how westerns get the idea of friendship just right (in my eyes, anyway). The film's fine balance of the realistic and the romantic. The fact that it pretty much blindsided me with how enjoyable it was--something that happens to me too little anymore, my film taste becoming more weathered and eccentric with each passing year. And, as my friend Stew put it, the fact that it's nice to watch a film upon which the fate of an entire genre doesn't rest.

However, what I'm fixated on right now are two scenes in the film, both involving a man's word being given. In one scene, a stranger gives his word to Cole that he'll testify against the villain (Jeremy Irons) in a court of law. In the other, Cole asks a criminal (Lance Henriksen) for his word to put aside any differences they might have and leave their showdown for a later time, given their need to team up for a spell.

A man's word is given. And taken. With speed. And without question.

I find grand satisfaction in this commonplace honor, however minor the application. Actually, I can't tell you which I find more beguiling: the fact that someone would be willing to
keep his word to a stranger, or that someone would be willing to accept the word of a stranger.

And yes, kids, I know this is a concept the movies (particularly the western and the gangster film) and fiction in general excel at promoting. I'm not so naive as that. (Okay, I'm close.)

I can't help it, though. The thought so wholly resonates with me, even though I realize it was probably never that commonplace. It is something, I suppose, that one may still find nowadays...albeit in rare corners.

And I guess that gets me back to why I love the Borgnine quote so much. Because it's not just the weight of your word that does you honor. The choice of whom you would trust with it really
is more important, particularly since that person would just as quickly keep theirs to you.

I can't really tell you why all this is on my mind. I think about stuff like this now and then, and as with most things probably way more seriously than I should. If nothing else, I hope you walk away with a good movie recommendation and a couple of minutes' entertainment from me sharing all this with you.

Alright. I'm done for the evening. Now that I've finished
Crooked Little Vein, I'm off to figure out what I'm going to read next.

Until next time...


Read: "Gonna Be a Long Drive," "Our Time on the Edge," "I Know, Right," and "Journeys Big and Small." They're all blogs my friends write, and they'll actually give you more entertainment and satisfaction than the books, movies, or music I usually recommend here. Enjoy them, kids.

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Spiro Was a Good Cat

I've had an awful couple of weeks, spent either doing too much navel-gazing or cleaning up the messes of others. In fact, I'm so full of regret and exhaustion that, quite absent-mindedly, I almost combed my hair with my razor today.

And if I ever get up off my lazy ass and get to writing seriously, that'll make a great first line of a story someday.

There have been a scant few moments of joy along the way. Here's one.

I was on the phone with my father two Wednesdays ago. To quote Fitzgerald, my father and I have "always been unusually communicative in a reserved way." I was talking to him about a whole host of things, including the fact that I'm thinking about getting a pet for the first time in a long time.

I'm going to get a cat; I'm just not sure when. Certainly not now, because my apartment complex doesn't allow cats if they're not de-clawed, and I won't have a de-clawed cat. I understand why people think that's a good idea; I'm just not one of those people. I think it's cruel.

Anyway, as I'm going on about wanting to get my first pet in over 10 years, out of nowhere he tells me this story about a cat named Spiro (yes, kids, for that Agnew guy). Incredulous at the fact that he'd had a cat named Spiro, I just had to hear more.

Now, as you read the following, it's even better if you can hear my dad's voice. For those of you who haven't met him, think of my voice lowered an octave and a touch more on the brusque side.

"Yep, I had a cat named Spiro. He actually belonged to all of us--me, Gary and Jon (his best friends and roommates at the time). Now, you see, the thing about Spiro was he
loved to hang out on our spiral staircase. He'd just plant himself in about the middle of the stairs, which were those open air jobs (the kind without risers). Whenever one of us would walk by, cool cat that he was, he'd quietly try to swipe our toupees. 'Course, the problem was none of us had toupees, you know?"

And I was laughing. Just couldn't help myself. It was the first time I'd laughed in, oh, 72 hours or so. And my dad did what anyone who'd received laughter from his storytelling would do: he continued.

"Ah, but there was one night, when Gary had some people over from work. And one of the poor guys walked under the staircase on his way to the bathroom. And ol' Spiro's just sittin' there, king of the whole place. And once that guy went under him, sure enough: THWIP! Off comes that guy's rug, and Spiro fuckin' bolts, man. I mean, he rockets up that staircase, and the guy's goin' apeshit chasin' after him."

I was, at this point, laughing hysterically.

"Spiro hides under the dresser upstairs, and oh no: he's not lettin' go of that toup. Gary ran up there after them, apoplectic as he could be, and he tried to get it back from Spiro. Me and Jon are just laughin' it up. Now, after a good little fight, Spiro let go of it, but not before he'd chewed a hole right through the middle of it.

"Yeah...Spiro was a good cat."

Was there some deeper meaning to all this? Of course not. It's merely a funny story, at least to me. So why did I preface it all with that
Gatsby quote? Because one of the things about my father is that he knows that, regardless of how awful things are for me, sometimes all I need is a good story.

This good story suffers from my retelling, but I post it nonetheless. I hope it's been worth your time to read it.


Read:
I Never Sang for My Father, by Robert Anderson
Watch:
Redbelt (dir. David Mamet, 2008)
Listen to:
Still, Moving, Light, by Simon Fisher Turner

Thursday, September 11, 2008

I've Read Watchmen, Too

A while back, I came across this story on Newsarama: http://www.newsarama.com/comics/080828-AfterWatchmen.html

This brief article posits next steps for new comic readers after reading
Watchmen, those novice 'mics readers presumably dashing to better bookstores everywhere in fevered anticipation of the film coming to a theater near everyone in March.

Before I go off on my little rant here, let me first say that I love the book. It's far from my favorite comic, but any reader with half a brain will tell you what a seminal work it is for graphic storytelling. I'm also simply blown away by the fact that a teaser trailer for the film is moving so much paper. And heartening as it is to see stacks of
Watchmen flying off the shelves--be it at a comic shop or at a Borders--my fear is this:

If you're starting out with
Watchmen, you're never going to want to go near another comic book ever again.

No disrespect to the retailer who provided the article, but I would NEVER send a new comic reader immediately to Alan Moore (with 1 exception), or Grant Morrison for that matter. Maybe I'm wrong. True,
Watchmen has few continuity obstacles, but it also belongs to a very specific time in comics history and is, in several ways, much too cumbersome a work to hurl into a new comic reader's hands and say, "Hey, newbie! This is what comics are all about! En-joy."

People need to go gently into that good night.

I know, I know. Opinions are like assholes. So let me be an asshole and give you my opinion.

The books below are, in my view, all perfectly reasonable--and reasonably perfect--jumping off points to read comics. I feel there's a solid mix of styles below, though all of the titles very clearly play to my sensibilities. The scripts possess no substantial continuity problems for the reader to tackle. The panel construction is readily decipherable (something I've given quite a bit of thought to over the past couple of years, as I've introduced or re-introduced several of my friends to comics).

And, perhaps most importantly, while
Watchmen may be tossed around by the cartooning cognoscenti as comics for smart people, only the most ignorant of readers deny the intelligence to be found in a story simply told.

This is also not to say that what I've listed below are my absolute favorite books. For example, you won't find books like
DC: The New Frontier or Identity Crisis on this, because they both require a working knowledge of the scope of the DC Universe. Even so...

Alright. Enough disclaimer-esque foreplay. Want to start (or restart) reading comics? These'll suit you right down to the ground:

Here we go, in no particular order...

1)
Superman: For All Seasons, by Jeph Loeb & Tim Sale
2)
Batman: Year One, by Frank Miller & David Mazzucchelli
3)
A Contract with God, by Will Eisner
4)
Queen & Country, Vol. 1: Operation Broken Ground, by Greg Rucka & Steve Rolston
5)
Fell, Vol. 1: Feral City, by Warren Ellis & Ben Templesmith
6)
Rising Stars, by J. Michael Straczynski et al
7)
The Amazing Spider-Man, by Stan Lee & Steve Ditko
8)
Marvels, by Kurt Busiek & Alex Ross
9)
Persepolis, by Marjane Satrapi
10)
Concrete, by Paul Chadwick
11)
The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, Vol. 1, by Alan Moore & Kevin O'Neill
12)
The Lone Ranger, by Brett Matthews et al
13)
Jack Kirby's Fourth World Saga, by Jack Kirby
14)
Athena Voltaire: Flight of the Falcon, by Steve Bryant
15)
Grendel, by Matt Wagner
16)
Criminal, by Ed Brubaker & Sean Philips
17)
Peanuts, by Charles Schultz
18)
Y: The Last Man, by Brian K. Vaughan & Pia Guerra
19)
Shortcomings, by Adrian Tomine
20)
Exit Wounds, by Rutu Modan

Let me know what you think of this list, particularly if you read any of these for the first time. I'll try to write more on each title at a later date.

As I said, while many of them
are, not all of these are my absolute favorites. However, maybe one or more of them can serve as a good first step...to you finding your own.


Read: um, any of the above, eh?
Watch:
I'll Sleep When I'm Dead (dir. Mike Hodges, 2003)
Listen to:
Do You Believe in Gosh?, by Mitch Hedberg (may he rest in peace)

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

No Goatees, Injustice Leagues, or Other Assorted Apocalypses

A quick one, as slumber's calling...

On September 10, the Large Hadron Collider at CERN was activated. And no black hole opened up and swallowed us all.

It may surprise some of you to hear this from me, but there's a small part of me that's sad that there was no black hole. Truly.

I mean, what a way to go: activating an underground machine in the noblest of pursuits--to understand the universe--which in turn boomerangs humanity's collective ass and throws us all a quantum middle finger on the way out.

Instead, maybe we're just a stride closer to discovering the shape of reality.

Which I'm hoping really is a theoretical snowflake existing in 196,833 dimensional space.


Read:
Planetary, by Warren Ellis & John Cassaday
Watch:
Papillon (dir. Franklin J. Schaffner, 1973)
Listen to:
O, by Tilly and the Wall

Sunday, August 31, 2008

A Third Brief Intermission

I was caught completely off guard by tonight's episode of Mad Men, in which the following quote caused an eruption of laughter that I'm certain woke any of my slumbering neighbors:

"Well, Marilyn is really a Joan, not the other way around."

For those of you who watch the show, I think you'll agree: truer words...

For those of you who don't watch the show...get to it. You'll see what I mean.

I love how laughter can be knowing, yet still surprising.

We now resume our regularly scheduled programming.


Read: No Borders, No Limits: Nikkatsu Action Cinema, by Mark Schilling
Watch: Two Men in Town (dir. Jose Giovanni, 1973)
Listen to: Back to Me, by Kathleen Edwards

Sunday, August 24, 2008

DC Now Means Darker Cinema

It is, of course, too early for these reports to count as gospel. Nevertheless, it looks like my earlier suspicions about a darker DC Universe on the silver screen are already justified:

http://www.darkhorizons.com/news08/080822g.php

Let me say first that I am all in favor of rebooting Superman. While I liked
Superman Returns well enough upon initial viewing, it has aged very, very poorly. At the end of the day, while it's a solid bookend to the Donner films, it just was not the Superman film we needed. It was too much of a rehash of, well, everything that had come before. For an example of what I think a reboot should look like--or at least the tone it should take--look to my reading suggestion.

The film's problem
was its darkness (and its ultimately yawn-inducing plainness relative to the other films). And now we want to make the reboot darker? So, is Superman forbidden from even cracking a smile now as he stands tall in a black and silver costume? Will Batman start introducing himself as "the goddamned Batman?" And how does one make the Flash darker without killing everything that makes him great, both in and of himself AND in relation to the other characters in the DC Universe?

Don't get me wrong. I'm glad DC's following Marvel's plan to introduce characters in their own movies first and then tie them together into the Justice League. It's what they should have done in the first place. And, it should be said that I've liked the Marvel films leading up to
The Avengers (i.e. Iron Man & The Incredible Hulk).

I just find the irony ridiculously rich with respect to tone of these films. Excepting the last few years, these companies' film series are taking the polar opposite approaches to their respective comic universes. I generally consider Marvel's to be a darker comic universe...mostly because DC characters smile more often. (Okay, that's not the only reason, but still...) DC has always felt more fun and sweeping to me, as opposed to Marvel's more grounded approach.

Now Marvel is shooting to make us marvel
again at their characters on the silver screen, while thanks to the brain donors over at Warner Bros., DC now means Darker Cinema.

I hate being right about crap like this.


Read:
Superman: For All Seasons, by Jeph Loeb & Tim Sale
Watch:
Batman: Mask of the Phantasm (dir. Eric Radomski & Bruce Timm, 1993)
Listen to: ME, you idiots who are going to make ruinous films with some of the greatest characters ever created! Don't do it! Do right by the characters!

Thursday, August 21, 2008

A Taste Quickly Acquired

It's causing me physical pain not to open this bottle of scotch I bought 2 1/2 weeks ago.

You see, kids, I've had quite a day. To say nothing of what's come before this very moment, right now my hands are twitchy from being so tired I can't sleep. I've had one meal today, thanks to my insane 10-hour work day, standard for this week. I'm in dire need of a metaphor-proof vest for all the foolish verbosity I've had hurled my way. And I cannot, for the fucking life of me, get Howard Shore's score to
The Departed to evacuate my brain.

And so here I am: a bottle of Macallan Cask Strength staring me in the face. Much as I ache for the warmth behind the eyes that this bottle of mahogany moonshine would provide, I made a two-part promise to myself:

1) I have to open it in celebration of something (besides resisting the urge to go on a crime spree)
2) I have to open it in the company of others who will partake (I find myself drinking alone more often lately. Boo-hoo.)

So rather than open it now, I'll twitch my fingers upon the keyboard for a short while and tell you about where I acquired that bottle: the Barriques Summer Single Malts Scotch Tasting.

Knowing that scotch is my thing, my friend Dave let me in on the fact that this wonderful event was happening August 2nd, and so we went and--for a paltry $14--sampled 9 different types of scotch. (Thanks also to those of you who let me know about it and I just didn't see your message until afterward.)

The guy who was running the event told us about this one guy who'd gone through all of the varieties in about 30 minutes flat the night before. Clearly, that idiot didn't want to enjoy himself, as we took about 2 1/2 to 3 hours to get the full experience (highly recommended).

I was a touch nervous at the start, since the first drink was not scotch but tequila--Maestro Dobel Reposado, to be exact. I've never had a taste for tequila, but the well aged agave fruit agreed quite nicely with my palate and made for an excellent primer. As I go through these, I'll end with the best comment associated with the drink--both in terms of accuracy as well as florid prose--as taken from the handout we were given. For the tequila: "intense viscous touch."

The first scotch on the table was a Glenmorangie 10-year. This is the only one with which I was already quite familiar, as it's what I normally keep at the house (either 10-year or 15). Hell, I'm savoring one as I type this. The immortal Sixteen Men of Tain gave us this godly start toward a heavenly brain wobble. Best comment associated with this drink: describing the aroma as "fruity with a hint of smoke."

Next up was the Bunnahabhain 12-year. Admittedly a pale preview of the last drink of the evening, this one had an even smokier scent than the Glenmorangie, but it was much nuttier to the palate. While I don't think it was as smooth as my normal Glenmorangie, I may have to start stocking this one at the house for variety's sake. Best comment: flat-out tie between "spectacular malty sweetness" and "a whisky alive with nautical folklore."

Then came the Deanston 12-year, which was the most surprising of the early selections. Equally pleasant to both nose and mouth, this had the most pleasantly smooth sting of the whole bunch. It's got a bit of fruit to it, but not as much as its predecessors. Additionally, it was the first to have a peaty element in the palate...again, surprisingly satisfying. Best comment: perhaps the most unintentionally dirty, the finish was described as "an elegantly subtle honeyed tail that is long and thought provoking."

And then the Ledaig 10-year swam from glass to gullet. According to the handout, "Liquorice and cloves combine into a medium length smoked pepper finale." Well, it was more like Robitussin-soaked gravel going down my throat. Of course, as bad as that sounds, I'd say it's like Lorca's poetry--his worst is better than most others' best. That being said, as long as I have other options, I'm apt to skip this one from now on. Best comment: on the subject of the scent, "Further intrigue develops from soft antiseptic hints and charred leather." Brother, he ain't lyin'.

Thankfully, the Dalmore 12-year came in to save us from all those antiseptic hints. Much smoother and much more citrus-y than I was expecting, Dalmore was a label I'd tried once either in a Boston pub or a Chicago restaurant. All that citrus was overwhelming in the best possible way. Best comment: opining upon the palate, "Good attack on the mouth, more elegance than muscle."

And then there was the Talisker 10-year. The guy running this thing warned us about the Talisker. He recommended it highly, but he told us it was peaty as all can get, which made us a little nervous. Using the word "peaty" to describe anything but soil gets me apoplectic, actually. That being said, I'd describe Talisker as the Jolt Cola of scotch; it'll knock you on your ass, but you'll be shocked as to how much you enjoy the taste on the way down. Best comment: finishes with "a lot of power and character with a dryish smoky quality."

The 1991 Glenrothes followed. With many of the brands before, I wasn't always able to taste all of the different flavors supposedly contained within these divinely fermented potions. Now I'm far from possessing the most sophisticated palate, but this frustrated me verily, since the flavor I often missed was the one I wanted most. There was no better example than the Glenrothes, which contained coconut, vanilla, and butterscotch. On the first taste, I did not get the one that I most wanted: the butterscotch. Drove me nuts, this did. Thankfully, unlike the previous drinks, I finally did get the flavor I wanted in the end. A blissful second of butterscotch is sometimes all you need. Best comment: "handpicked by the Malt Master," which is not all that descriptive. But come on...wouldn't you want to be called the Malt Master?

The penultimate drink of the evening was the one for which I'm now eagerly awaiting to open my own bottle: the Macallan Cask Strength. For the very few of you I've not mentioned this to, here we go. Scotch is usually between 40 and 45% alcohol. This stuff is 60%. No chill filtration. No water added. Cask. Strength. Specifically, Sherry oak casks from Spain. Add water. Release the flavor. From the mahogany color to the smoky taste, it's just about perfect. I was hunting for a bottle after we finished up the tasting, and I ended up taking their last one. It was 70 bucks and worth every penny. Or it would be, if I'd just open the damn thing. Best comment: "a hint of wood smoke," which is itself the smallest hint at how fantastic this stuff is.

And then...oh, then...was the Bunnahabhain 25-year. I've never tasted scotch to date, or any drink for that matter, this amazing. I can't give you just one comment; here's the write-up.

Color: A rich, nutty gold.
Nose: Sweet caramel dessert aromas beautifully entwine with subtle suggestions of oak and polished leather.
Palate: Indulgent hints of sweet berries and cream create a wonderful melange of tastes that progress into a roasted nut and malt feast sprinkled with only the most complementary of spices to balance the profile perfectly.
Finish: A soft dry finish leaves you with a lingering sense of sugar and spiced-oak flavors dispersing delicately on your tongue.

In retrospect, this must be what it was like to...I don't know...kiss Rita Hayworth, maybe.

After finishing the glass, I asked how much a bottle cost. Wearing a knowing smile, the guy said, "$310." While I could
not afford it at the time, I find that kind of excessive extravagance does me good now and again. So, I'll save up for a bottle and order one next year. I'll then make it last at least a year, if not two. You're all welcome to join me for a drink (those of you who enjoy scotch anyway, of which I think there are two).

Alright, my Glenmorangie is long finished, and I think I can finally drift off now.

Before I go, thanks again to my friend Dave--for letting me know about this thing, coming with, and indulging my seemingly ceaseless need to talk about
The Dark Knight. After the 25-year it was difficult (to say the least) to want to follow that taste up with anything. We had to, though, as a few hours of savory libation are liable to make a man hungry. King of Falafel did the trick.


Read:
Winning Pocket Billiards, by Willie Mosconi
Watch:
Mad Men (the only reason the AMC network exists)
Listen to:
Bring Yo' Ass to the Table, by Left Lane Cruiser (What can I say? Sometimes I just want to listen to punkish bar blues.)